diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
index 278e1b3..71b09c8 100644
--- a/config.json
+++ b/config.json
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         "type": "dspy.Reasoning"
       }
     },
-    "description": "You are evaluating search results for a technical investment diligence report.\nGiven a research topic and a search result, judge how relevant it is.\n\nScoring:\n1 = Not relevant. Completely different domain, product, or problem.\n2 = Marginally relevant. Loosely related but addresses a different specific problem.\n3 = Relevant. Same technical problem or domain \u2014 worth including in a research dump.\n4 = Highly relevant. Directly discusses the core problem with practitioner experience,\n    benchmarks, or specific tool comparisons. High signal for diligence.\n\nFocus on technical specificity. Generic advice scores lower than specific\npractitioner experience with real numbers or tool names.",
+    "description": "You are evaluating search results for a technical investment diligence report.\nGiven a research topic and a search result, judge how relevant it is.\n\nScoring:\n1 = Not relevant. Completely different domain, product, or problem.\n2 = Marginally relevant. Loosely related but addresses a different specific problem.\n3 = Relevant. Same technical problem or domain \u2014 worth including in a research dump.\n4 = Highly relevant. Directly discusses the core problem with practitioner experience,\n    benchmarks, or specific tool comparisons. High signal for diligence.\n\nFocus on technical specificity. Generic vendor advice scores lower than specific\npractitioner experience with real numbers or tool names.",
     "properties": {
       "topic": {
         "__dspy_field_type": "input",
diff --git a/program.json b/program.json
index 61de39b..37dfe2b 100644
--- a/program.json
+++ b/program.json
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
   "train": [],
   "demos": [],
   "signature": {
-    "instructions": "You are evaluating search results for a technical investment diligence report.\nGiven a research topic and a search result, judge how relevant it is.\n\nScoring:\n1 = Not relevant. Completely different domain, product, or problem.\n2 = Marginally relevant. Loosely related but addresses a different specific problem.\n3 = Relevant. Same technical problem or domain \u2014 worth including in a research dump.\n4 = Highly relevant. Directly discusses the core problem with practitioner experience,\n    benchmarks, or specific tool comparisons. High signal for diligence.\n\nFocus on technical specificity. Generic advice scores lower than specific\npractitioner experience with real numbers or tool names.",
+    "instructions": "You are evaluating search results for a technical investment diligence report.\nGiven a research topic and a search result, judge how relevant it is.\n\nScoring:\n1 = Not relevant. Completely different domain, product, or problem.\n2 = Marginally relevant. Loosely related but addresses a different specific problem.\n3 = Relevant. Same technical problem or domain \u2014 worth including in a research dump.\n4 = Highly relevant. Directly discusses the core problem with practitioner experience,\n    benchmarks, or specific tool comparisons. High signal for diligence.\n\nFocus on technical specificity. Generic vendor advice scores lower than specific\npractitioner experience with real numbers or tool names.",
     "fields": [
       {
         "prefix": "Topic:",