From fc0e933e2dbc06eb64b3e291ba3600eb4c80cb24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tyrin Todd <tyrin@modaic.dev>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:08:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] server-inference push argument_quality_ranking

---
 README.md    |  5 ++++-
 config.json  | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 program.json | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 config.json
 create mode 100644 program.json

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 4236ae0..7cb3ec3 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
-# argument_quality_ranking
+---
+{}
+---
 
+# argument_quality_ranking
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1cde960
--- /dev/null
+++ b/config.json
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+{
+  "model": null,
+  "signature": {
+    "description": "Classify whether an argument is high or low quality for the provided topic. As you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how the instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the knowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are unsure about your answer.",
+    "properties": {
+      "topic": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "input",
+        "desc": "Discussion topic for the argument.",
+        "prefix": "Topic:",
+        "title": "Topic",
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "argument": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "input",
+        "desc": "Argument text to classify.",
+        "prefix": "Argument:",
+        "title": "Argument",
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "reasoning": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "output",
+        "desc": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty, ambiguity, or uncertainty in your thought process when relevant.",
+        "prefix": "Reasoning:",
+        "title": "Reasoning",
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "quality_label": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "output",
+        "desc": "Final argument quality label.",
+        "enum": [
+          "high_quality",
+          "low_quality"
+        ],
+        "prefix": "Quality Label:",
+        "title": "Quality Label",
+        "type": "string"
+      }
+    },
+    "required": [
+      "topic",
+      "argument",
+      "reasoning",
+      "quality_label"
+    ],
+    "title": "ArgumentQualityJudgeSig",
+    "type": "object"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/program.json b/program.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f468660
--- /dev/null
+++ b/program.json
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+{
+  "traces": [],
+  "train": [],
+  "demos": [],
+  "signature": {
+    "instructions": "Classify whether an argument is high or low quality for the provided topic. As you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how the instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the knowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are unsure about your answer.",
+    "fields": [
+      {
+        "prefix": "Topic:",
+        "description": "Discussion topic for the argument."
+      },
+      {
+        "prefix": "Argument:",
+        "description": "Argument text to classify."
+      },
+      {
+        "prefix": "Reasoning:",
+        "description": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty, ambiguity, or uncertainty in your thought process when relevant."
+      },
+      {
+        "prefix": "Quality Label:",
+        "description": "Final argument quality label."
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "lm": {
+    "model": "together_ai/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-Turbo",
+    "model_type": "chat",
+    "cache": true,
+    "num_retries": 3,
+    "finetuning_model": null,
+    "launch_kwargs": {},
+    "train_kwargs": {},
+    "temperature": null,
+    "max_tokens": null
+  },
+  "metadata": {
+    "dependency_versions": {
+      "python": "3.11",
+      "dspy": "3.1.3",
+      "cloudpickle": "3.1"
+    }
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file