diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index e69de29..1388a48 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+---
+{}
+---
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c58492d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/config.json
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+{
+  "model": null,
+  "signature": {
+    "description": "Rate the innovation level of the following patent description on a 1-5 scale.\n\nConsider the following criteria:\n- Novelty: Does it describe something genuinely new compared to prior art?\n- Technical advancement: Does it represent a meaningful step forward in its field?\n- Breadth of application: Could the invention apply to many use cases?\n- Practical impact: Is it likely to have real-world value if implemented?\n\nScore 1 = incremental / derivative, 3 = moderate innovation, 5 = highly novel\nand impactful breakthrough.\n\nAs you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how\nthe instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the\nknowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are\nunsure about your answer.",
+    "properties": {
+      "description": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "input",
+        "desc": "The patent description or abstract text to evaluate.",
+        "prefix": "Description:",
+        "title": "Description",
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "reasoning": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "output",
+        "desc": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty when relevant.",
+        "prefix": "Reasoning:",
+        "title": "Reasoning",
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "innovation_score": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "output",
+        "desc": "Innovation level score on a 1-5 scale.",
+        "enum": [
+          "1",
+          "2",
+          "3",
+          "4",
+          "5"
+        ],
+        "prefix": "Innovation Score:",
+        "title": "Innovation Score",
+        "type": "string"
+      }
+    },
+    "required": [
+      "description",
+      "reasoning",
+      "innovation_score"
+    ],
+    "title": "BigPatentInnovationJudgeSig",
+    "type": "object"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/program.json b/program.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1848e3d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/program.json
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+{
+  "traces": [],
+  "train": [],
+  "demos": [],
+  "signature": {
+    "instructions": "Rate the innovation level of the following patent description on a 1-5 scale.\n\nConsider the following criteria:\n- Novelty: Does it describe something genuinely new compared to prior art?\n- Technical advancement: Does it represent a meaningful step forward in its field?\n- Breadth of application: Could the invention apply to many use cases?\n- Practical impact: Is it likely to have real-world value if implemented?\n\nScore 1 = incremental / derivative, 3 = moderate innovation, 5 = highly novel\nand impactful breakthrough.\n\nAs you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how\nthe instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the\nknowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are\nunsure about your answer.",
+    "fields": [
+      {
+        "prefix": "Description:",
+        "description": "The patent description or abstract text to evaluate."
+      },
+      {
+        "prefix": "Reasoning:",
+        "description": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty when relevant."
+      },
+      {
+        "prefix": "Innovation Score:",
+        "description": "Innovation level score on a 1-5 scale."
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "lm": {
+    "model": "together_ai/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-Turbo",
+    "model_type": "chat",
+    "cache": true,
+    "num_retries": 3,
+    "finetuning_model": null,
+    "launch_kwargs": {},
+    "train_kwargs": {},
+    "temperature": null,
+    "max_tokens": null
+  },
+  "metadata": {
+    "dependency_versions": {
+      "python": "3.11",
+      "dspy": "3.1.3",
+      "cloudpickle": "3.1"
+    }
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file