server-inference push code_judge_bench

This commit is contained in:
2026-04-23 23:09:25 -07:00
parent 5359514398
commit 65f0c99978
3 changed files with 108 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
# code_judge_bench ---
{}
---
# code_judge_bench

56
config.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
{
"model": null,
"signature": {
"description": "Reason step-by-step to determine which code implementation is better for the given problem.\nAs you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how the instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the knowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are unsure about your answer. Your reasoning must lead directly to\nthe better code option (A or B).",
"properties": {
"problem": {
"__dspy_field_type": "input",
"desc": "The coding problem to be solved.",
"prefix": "Problem:",
"title": "Problem",
"type": "string"
},
"code_A": {
"__dspy_field_type": "input",
"desc": "The first code implementation.",
"prefix": "Code A:",
"title": "Code A",
"type": "string"
},
"code_B": {
"__dspy_field_type": "input",
"desc": "The second code implementation.",
"prefix": "Code B:",
"title": "Code B",
"type": "string"
},
"reasoning": {
"__dspy_field_type": "output",
"desc": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty, ambiguity, or uncertainty in your thought process when relevant.",
"prefix": "Reasoning:",
"title": "Reasoning",
"type": "string"
},
"label": {
"__dspy_field_type": "output",
"desc": "The label of the better code implementation ('A' or 'B').",
"enum": [
"A",
"B"
],
"prefix": "Label:",
"title": "Label",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"problem",
"code_A",
"code_B",
"reasoning",
"label"
],
"title": "CodePreferenceJudgeSig",
"type": "object"
}
}

48
program.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
{
"traces": [],
"train": [],
"demos": [],
"signature": {
"instructions": "Reason step-by-step to determine which code implementation is better for the given problem.\nAs you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how the instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the knowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are unsure about your answer. Your reasoning must lead directly to\nthe better code option (A or B).",
"fields": [
{
"prefix": "Problem:",
"description": "The coding problem to be solved."
},
{
"prefix": "Code A:",
"description": "The first code implementation."
},
{
"prefix": "Code B:",
"description": "The second code implementation."
},
{
"prefix": "Reasoning:",
"description": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty, ambiguity, or uncertainty in your thought process when relevant."
},
{
"prefix": "Label:",
"description": "The label of the better code implementation ('A' or 'B')."
}
]
},
"lm": {
"model": "together_ai/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-Turbo",
"model_type": "chat",
"cache": true,
"num_retries": 3,
"finetuning_model": null,
"launch_kwargs": {},
"train_kwargs": {},
"temperature": null,
"max_tokens": null
},
"metadata": {
"dependency_versions": {
"python": "3.11",
"dspy": "3.1.3",
"cloudpickle": "3.1"
}
}
}