From f9ace01bcf04bfbf2ab531ca86341ffd1e4742f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tyrin Todd Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:09:04 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] server-inference push judge_bench --- README.md | 5 ++++- config.json | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ program.json | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 config.json create mode 100644 program.json diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 5c84128..bd9511a 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,2 +1,5 @@ -# judge_bench +--- +{} +--- +# judge_bench \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/config.json b/config.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e97829a --- /dev/null +++ b/config.json @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +{ + "model": null, + "signature": { + "description": "Reason step-by-step to determine which response is better for the given context.\nAs you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how the instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the knowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are unsure about your answer. Your reasoning must lead directly to\nthe better response (A or B).", + "properties": { + "question": { + "__dspy_field_type": "input", + "desc": "The question or prompt provided.", + "prefix": "Question:", + "title": "Question", + "type": "string" + }, + "response_A": { + "__dspy_field_type": "input", + "desc": "The first response option.", + "prefix": "Response A:", + "title": "Response A", + "type": "string" + }, + "response_B": { + "__dspy_field_type": "input", + "desc": "The second response option.", + "prefix": "Response B:", + "title": "Response B", + "type": "string" + }, + "reasoning": { + "__dspy_field_type": "output", + "desc": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty, ambiguity, or uncertainty in your thought process when relevant.", + "prefix": "Reasoning:", + "title": "Reasoning", + "type": "string" + }, + "label": { + "__dspy_field_type": "output", + "desc": "The label of the better response ('A' or 'B').", + "enum": [ + "A", + "B" + ], + "prefix": "Label:", + "title": "Label", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "question", + "response_A", + "response_B", + "reasoning", + "label" + ], + "title": "PreferenceJudgeSig", + "type": "object" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/program.json b/program.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1962771 --- /dev/null +++ b/program.json @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +{ + "traces": [], + "train": [], + "demos": [], + "signature": { + "instructions": "Reason step-by-step to determine which response is better for the given context.\nAs you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how the instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the knowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are unsure about your answer. Your reasoning must lead directly to\nthe better response (A or B).", + "fields": [ + { + "prefix": "Question:", + "description": "The question or prompt provided." + }, + { + "prefix": "Response A:", + "description": "The first response option." + }, + { + "prefix": "Response B:", + "description": "The second response option." + }, + { + "prefix": "Reasoning:", + "description": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty, ambiguity, or uncertainty in your thought process when relevant." + }, + { + "prefix": "Label:", + "description": "The label of the better response ('A' or 'B')." + } + ] + }, + "lm": { + "model": "together_ai/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-Turbo", + "model_type": "chat", + "cache": true, + "num_retries": 3, + "finetuning_model": null, + "launch_kwargs": {}, + "train_kwargs": {}, + "temperature": null, + "max_tokens": null + }, + "metadata": { + "dependency_versions": { + "python": "3.11", + "dspy": "3.1.3", + "cloudpickle": "3.1" + } + } +} \ No newline at end of file