diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 2fbd62d..3584499 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,2 +1,5 @@ -# tweet_eval_stance_feminist +--- +{} +--- +# tweet_eval_stance_feminist \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/config.json b/config.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1ffd5a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/config.json @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +{ + "model": null, + "signature": { + "description": "Classify tweet stance toward the provided topic as none, against, or favor. As you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how the instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the knowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are unsure about your answer.", + "properties": { + "tweet": { + "__dspy_field_type": "input", + "desc": "Tweet text to classify.", + "prefix": "Tweet:", + "title": "Tweet", + "type": "string" + }, + "topic": { + "__dspy_field_type": "input", + "desc": "Topic that stance should be determined against.", + "prefix": "Topic:", + "title": "Topic", + "type": "string" + }, + "reasoning": { + "__dspy_field_type": "output", + "desc": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty, ambiguity, or uncertainty in your thought process when relevant.", + "prefix": "Reasoning:", + "title": "Reasoning", + "type": "string" + }, + "stance_label": { + "__dspy_field_type": "output", + "desc": "Final stance label.", + "enum": [ + "none", + "against", + "favor" + ], + "prefix": "Stance Label:", + "title": "Stance Label", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "tweet", + "topic", + "reasoning", + "stance_label" + ], + "title": "TweetEvalStanceJudgeSig", + "type": "object" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/program.json b/program.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0728b35 --- /dev/null +++ b/program.json @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +{ + "traces": [], + "train": [], + "demos": [], + "signature": { + "instructions": "Classify tweet stance toward the provided topic as none, against, or favor. As you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how the instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the knowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are unsure about your answer.", + "fields": [ + { + "prefix": "Tweet:", + "description": "Tweet text to classify." + }, + { + "prefix": "Topic:", + "description": "Topic that stance should be determined against." + }, + { + "prefix": "Reasoning:", + "description": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty, ambiguity, or uncertainty in your thought process when relevant." + }, + { + "prefix": "Stance Label:", + "description": "Final stance label." + } + ] + }, + "lm": { + "model": "together_ai/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-Turbo", + "model_type": "chat", + "cache": true, + "num_retries": 3, + "finetuning_model": null, + "launch_kwargs": {}, + "train_kwargs": {}, + "temperature": null, + "max_tokens": null + }, + "metadata": { + "dependency_versions": { + "python": "3.11", + "dspy": "3.1.3", + "cloudpickle": "3.1" + } + } +} \ No newline at end of file