From c0bf8171dae68fe89b8bafddbaafa4e335e5ecba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tyrin Todd <tyrin@modaic.dev>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:06:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] server-inference push tweet_eval_stance_hillary

---
 README.md    |  5 ++++-
 config.json  | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 program.json | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 config.json
 create mode 100644 program.json

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 5d8be83..81c58bb 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
-# tweet_eval_stance_hillary
+---
+{}
+---
 
+# tweet_eval_stance_hillary
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ffd5a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/config.json
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+{
+  "model": null,
+  "signature": {
+    "description": "Classify tweet stance toward the provided topic as none, against, or favor. As you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how the instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the knowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are unsure about your answer.",
+    "properties": {
+      "tweet": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "input",
+        "desc": "Tweet text to classify.",
+        "prefix": "Tweet:",
+        "title": "Tweet",
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "topic": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "input",
+        "desc": "Topic that stance should be determined against.",
+        "prefix": "Topic:",
+        "title": "Topic",
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "reasoning": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "output",
+        "desc": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty, ambiguity, or uncertainty in your thought process when relevant.",
+        "prefix": "Reasoning:",
+        "title": "Reasoning",
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "stance_label": {
+        "__dspy_field_type": "output",
+        "desc": "Final stance label.",
+        "enum": [
+          "none",
+          "against",
+          "favor"
+        ],
+        "prefix": "Stance Label:",
+        "title": "Stance Label",
+        "type": "string"
+      }
+    },
+    "required": [
+      "tweet",
+      "topic",
+      "reasoning",
+      "stance_label"
+    ],
+    "title": "TweetEvalStanceJudgeSig",
+    "type": "object"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/program.json b/program.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0728b35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/program.json
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+{
+  "traces": [],
+  "train": [],
+  "demos": [],
+  "signature": {
+    "instructions": "Classify tweet stance toward the provided topic as none, against, or favor. As you reason, note any uncertainties, ambiguities, and gaps \u2014 both in how the instructions apply to the task at hand and in whether you have the knowledge needed to solve it. Be honest in your reasoning when you are unsure about your answer.",
+    "fields": [
+      {
+        "prefix": "Tweet:",
+        "description": "Tweet text to classify."
+      },
+      {
+        "prefix": "Topic:",
+        "description": "Topic that stance should be determined against."
+      },
+      {
+        "prefix": "Reasoning:",
+        "description": "Step-by-step reasoning, including uncertainty, ambiguity, or uncertainty in your thought process when relevant."
+      },
+      {
+        "prefix": "Stance Label:",
+        "description": "Final stance label."
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "lm": {
+    "model": "together_ai/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-Turbo",
+    "model_type": "chat",
+    "cache": true,
+    "num_retries": 3,
+    "finetuning_model": null,
+    "launch_kwargs": {},
+    "train_kwargs": {},
+    "temperature": null,
+    "max_tokens": null
+  },
+  "metadata": {
+    "dependency_versions": {
+      "python": "3.11",
+      "dspy": "3.1.3",
+      "cloudpickle": "3.1"
+    }
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file